Ir al contenido principal

Covered Calls - In The Money (ITM) Versus Out Of The Money (OTM)

Anyone just starting out in covered calls needs to decide if they want to focus on an in-the-money (ITM) or an out-of-the-money (OTM) strategy. This is a significant decision that will have important effects on your long term success and that amount of success.
Benefits of ITM

(1) More Protection: ITM strategies obviously offer more downside protection than OTM. You will make the same amount if the stock goes up, stays flat, or goes down to a certain percentage that it is ITM. (%ITM is the % the stock must drop to reach the strike price {$purchased - $strike}/$purchase)
This is a HUGE advantage because ITM systems are more forgiving of price fluctuations and mistakes on the trader's part.

(2) Since an ITM trader is more likely to be called out at the end of the month, every month you will research and find the highest yielding CC positions that meet your requirements. Compared to an OTM strategy, you are more often left with the stock at the end of the month since it did not rise to the strike price. When you write another call for the next month it may not have a high premium anymore because the "market excitement" that caused the premium to be high in the first place has disappeared for whatever reason (for example a quarterly earning report was what initially caused that excitement has passed).
I believe this reason is very minor compared to the first one. It can probably be ignored, but I added it for completeness.

(3) In a down-trending market, which happens about 30% - 40% of the time, an OTM strategy simply does not work. This is because the vast majority of stocks follow the market to an extent (defined as Beta). It is very hard to find up-trending stocks in a down-trending market. So in a downward market a CC trader can select positions perhaps 6% ITM or more and be successful. However in this scenario, the premium received will be much smaller than in an upward market so the trader must trade with enough money per position to prevent trading costs taking up all his gains.

Disadvantage of In-the-Money and Advantages of Out-of-the-Money

(1) Trading Costs: Since an ITM strategy has more positions called out at the end of the month, trading costs will be higher. In a scenario where the stock is flat, there will be two stock orders and on option order for an ITM position vice on stock order and one option order in an OTM position.

(2) Higher R-multiples in ITM: The max R-multiple is the ratio of the max amount gained divided by the amount lost if the position is stopped out. Since OTM positions make more money if the stock goes up, the max R-multiples are higher for OTM positions. Thus OTM strategies follow more to an extent the old trading adage "letting your profits run." (I say "to an extent" because all CC strategies limit the upside, regardless if it is ITM or OTM.) This is why OTM strategies can potentially be more profitable, but more risky.

(3) Since in an ITM strategy, you will be called out more frequently at the end of the month, you will need to research more positions every month. This will take more of your time (whether this is good or bad depends on you). In an OTM strategy, you will more often NOT be called out. Then you would simply sell another option on the same stock that would give the highest premium. This saves time because the majority of your research time is on the stock, not the option.

(4) For my next point, you need to understand one of the four greeks: delta.
In options, delta is the amount an option goes up or down when the underlying stock goes up or down by $1.00. Options ITM have deltas closer to 1.0 compared to options that are OTM.
So for example, say you are in an ITM position that the stock just went up $3. The option has a delta of 0.8, so the option went up by $2.40 ($3 * .8), which is a debit in your account. So in total your position went up $3 - $2.40 = $0.60.
In another example, you are in an OTM position that went up $3 whose option delta is 0.6. Thus the option went up $1.80 (or debit in your account) and your total position went up $3 - $1.8 = $1.20.
It is the OTM scenario where you are easier able to do a roll-out to capture a quick gain in the stock. (A roll out is buying back the call and selling the stock prior to expiration). This is much harder in an ITM strategy because when the stock jumps, so does the option by almost the same amount.
This is a HUGE advantage to OTM strategies. A good OTM CC trader will use auto-roll-outs frequently. In these cases, he would not have made as much money if he would have waited until the end of the month, but rolling out early completely removes the risk of the stock dropping again later. Additionally, he can take that money and re-invest it in another position. Like I said before, this is a HUGE benefit to OTM traders.

Which Strategy is best for Me?

In a downward market, an ITM strategy should be the only option. Some will look at a covered call screener and still see high yielding OTM positions. However, these stocks are more likely to head south and you will be stopped out. Remember, 100% of the risk is in the stock.
In an upward market, I initially thought that the only people who should trade OTM are people who fully understand the concepts of position sizing and expectancy. But any CC trader should understand these concepts (see Trade your Way to Financial Freedom by Dr. Van Tharp)

I now believe based on my own experience that whether or not someone should trade OTM CC's is based on one thing: experience. It strongly recommend that any OTM trader should have prior experience as a trader of any kind. This experience can be an ITM strategy or any sort of other system.

Another option if you think you are somewhere in the middle is to trade both ITM and OTM. Perhaps you could have half of your positions in ITM and the other half in OTM.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Fred_Thompson

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Buy American. I Am.

By WARREN E. BUFFETT Op-Ed Contributor Published: Omaha, October 16, 2008 THE financial world is a mess, both in the United States and abroad. Its problems, moreover, have been leaking into the general economy, and the leaks are now turning into a gusher. In the near term, unemployment will rise, business activity will falter and headlines will continue to be scary. So ... I’ve been buying American stocks. This is my personal account I’m talking about, in which I previously owned nothing but United States government bonds. (This description leaves aside my Berkshire Hathaway holdings, which are all committed to philanthropy.) If prices keep looking attractive, my non-Berkshire net worth will soon be 100 percent in United States equities. Why? A simple rule dictates my buying: Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful. And most certainly, fear is now widespread, gripping even seasoned investors. To be sure, investors are right to be wary of highly leverage...

Placing Bets on Energy

By CONRAD de AENLLE Published: November 21, 2008 WHEN crude oil sailed above $140 a barrel, analysts forecast even higher prices, virtually without dissent. Four months have passed, crude has fallen below $50, and now a rally generally seems to be considered almost out of the question. Betting against the consensus by selling energy stocks would have paid off several months ago, and the opposite play, equally contrarian, might be profitable now. Shares of many suppliers of oil and natural gas have lost half their value or more in the stock market’s race to the bottom, and may be good buys. Robb J. Parlanti, an analyst and fund manager at Turner Investment Partners, expects gas producers to be the biggest beneficiaries if energy prices recover. He emphasizes the “if,” however, and advises investors to “stick with high-quality companies that are good to own even if the market doesn’t come back.” Those he has in mind include XTO Energy, Range Resources , Southwestern Energy , Petrohawk En...

No Depression

This Time, Uncle Sam Has Got Our Back By Laurence J. Kotlikoff and Perry Mehrling The Washington Post Thursday, October 9, 2008; Page A21 Global markets have not been reassured by the coordinated interest rate cuts of several central banks or by recent congressional action, but they should be. Our bet is that financial markets will return to normal in short order and that the U.S. economy will squeak by with a moderate recession. Recapitalizing the banks and working out mortgages will take time, but the financial system will not collapse -- the government won't let it. The markets, of course, seem to be factoring in some probability of collapse. Why is this wrong? For starters, the biggest subprime mortgage gamblers have already failed, been nationalized or been married off, shotgun-style, to banks run by grown-ups. Yes, lots of small shoes may still drop, but the Paulson "buy-up" bill, and, ultimately, the Fed's ability to print money, provides the Treasury and Feder...